| UD ( ÛD-OUD ) | ||||
| Prepared by Ali Tutan | ||||
|
(Translated
from Turkish by Tolga Bektaş) |
||||
|
The
word “ud” is originally Arabic and it is derived form “al-oud”,
meaning aloes-wood tree. The prefix “al” is a proposition which the
Turks have discarded and transformed the word “oud” (consisting of
the Arabic letters eyn, waw, dal) into “ud”, for the letter
“eyn” is not suitable to their throat structure. The Western world
has met the oud in-between the 11th-13th centuries,
during the Crusades and has taken the oud along with them to Europe.
Afterwards, they have named this instrument as luth (Fr.), lute (Eng.),
laute (German), liuto (Italian), Alaud (Spanish), Luit (Dutch), all
beginning with the letter “L”. The word “luthier” meaning
instrument maker is also derived form the word “luth”.
It
is indeed a very quick and a wrong decision to claim that ud is an
Arabic instrument, due to to origin of its name. Actually, the Arabs
have seen this instrument for the first time in the hands of Turkish
workers who have came to Baghdad from Khorasan in the 7th
century. Although the Arabs named it “el-oud” due to its soundboard
made from aloe wood (aloexyion agallocum), the instrument is no other
than the thousand-year old Turkish Kopuz where the Turks have adopted
this shorter name instead of the original one. As a matter of fact,
beginning with the Huns, there was no Turkish army that did not have
kopuz players (In the illiterate period, the Arabs did not know any
instrument other than the ‘def’ and the single-stringed instrument
‘rababe’). The two most prominent musicologists of this century and
the biggest Turkish literature historian have put this fact forward[1].
Ud is called as ‘kobza’ in Hungarian, a slightly changed version of
the ud. Furthermore, in Dede Korkut epics, ‘kobza’ is used as a verb
derived from kopuz, meaning ‘playing an instrument mutually’. The ud, with its resemblers such as the Chinese ‘Pi-Pa’ and the Iranian ‘Barbud’, has traveled from Asia to Anatolia, and further to Rumeli under the name ‘kopuz’. It has even been mentioned as a sacred instrument in the poems of Yunus Emre, a well-known poet as well as a musician[2]. The ud and the şehrud, being different sized ‘kopuz’s, are seen in the foremost plan in the miniatures seen in the ‘surname’s, which are texts written for the occasion of Ottoman celebrations such as weddings. The number of ud players among the musicians of the Ottoman court in-between the 15th and the 19th century has been mentioned in the research of Uzunçarşılı, along with their names and salaries[3].
THE
TECHNICAL STRUCTURE OF THE UD AND ITS FEATURES
The
next thing to do after the body is taken out of the mould is to stick on
a semi-circular piece sized 10-15 cm x 5-6 cm x 3-4 mm, along the
symmetrical axis on the top part. This piece, of a similar color and
material of the body is called a ‘mirror’ and is polished along with
the body long after the soundboard is affixed. The function of the
mirror is to cover of the dirtiness of the sharp ends of the slices and
fillets, joined at the lower end of the body. The body, without the
soundboard, neck and pegbox weighs surprisingly about 300-600 grams
after it has been taken off from the mould. It should be pointed out
that the more the slices of the ud (about 23-27), the more it will have
a rounder shape and consequently better quality. Since sound is
reflected just like light, it is important that the inner surface be non-broken
and smooth, where the sound is reflected in and out through the
soundholes.
The
flat part of the neck (fingerboard) where the fingers will play is
covered with a board with a thickness of 2 mm on the wide front size and
4-5 mm on the narrow backside. The backside of the neck where the palm
grasps is covered with fillets and coatings. A coating of 3 mm width and
0.5 mm thickness covers the round part where the neck is connected to
the body. This coat is called a ‘metal ring/bracelet’ due to its
shape and used to cover the dirtiness of the ends of the slices and
fillets where they join. The bracelet is polished later on with the body
and should be as slim as possible so that it seems elegant.
The
pegbox is made from lime wood of in a sinusoidal shape decreasing from 4
cm to 1.7 cm and the 5 mm thick cheeks narrowing down from 36-38 mm to
22-24 mm. It has a U cross section where the cheeks and the backside are
covered with the same wood as of the body. 6 conical holes are created
on top and 5 at the bottom, for the small pegs that will be inserted in.
The tip of the pegbox is made from a round and carved piece called a “beak”,
which resembles the violin scroll. Just like the pegbox and its fillets,
the beak is one of the compontents, which gives an idea about the
quality of the ud. The pegbox is connected to the neck by an angle of
40-42 degrees. While completing all these tasks, the soundboard, which
has been sandpapered, should be covered with paper to prevent dirt. Now,
it’s time for polishing.
After
the polish is dried out, the ‘tension bridge’ is glued on to the
soundboard, located 8.5-11 cm inwards from the bottom side. This piece
has 11 holes on it for the strings and it is made from hornbeam wood
with a width of 2.5 cm, a length of 14 cm and a height of 1 cm. For all
the strings to be leveled out, the holes become closer to the board for
the high-pitched strings since the low-pitched strings are thicker. Due
to the same reason, the bridge is glued on the board so that the higher
tip is 1 mm closer to the bottom side and not parallel, for all the
string lengths to be equal. The leaking glue after the bridge has been
glued on to the board should be cleaned up with a warm-watered clean
cloth and later sanded with fine sandpaper. The small bridge, which is
made from ivory with a length of 36-40 mm, a thickness of 3 mm and a
height of 5-6 mm is set on the L-profiled gap between the pegbox and the
neck. The locations of the strings are then set out on the ivory using a
template and 11 gutters are carved in for the strings. To prevent the
strings from breaking off while putting on or tuning, the gutters are
rubbed on with dry soap.
The
string, being the 5th main component of the ud, has been made
from silk in the early dates whereas gut has also been used later on. In
the modern era, the two lower pairs of strings are made from nylon of a
0.55-0.70 and 0.65-0.80 mm diameter. The other three pairs and the
uppermost single string are made from silk covered with a very fine
alloy made from copper, nickel and silver. The best quality strings are
not “ud” strings, but lute strings made by a German Company named
“Pyramid”.
The “ud” strings are rather made for the Arab market and are too thick
for the delicate Turkish ud, and can be harmful. Those who are
interested in buying these strings should notice that it is “Laute Seiten” and not “Oud Seiten”, which is inscribed on the
package,. The type of strings that the master musician Cinuçen Tanrıkorur
uses –written in order from the lowermost pair to the higher most
single string– are #0.55, #0.65, #1008, #1014, #1023, #1441. These
strings are too fine for those who look for volume rather than deep
vibrations in the ud. But it should be noted that, thick strings used to
obtain high volume may result in bending the neck by loading a lot of
pressure on the instrument. The thickness of the strings can be measured
by using a “micrometer”.
DIFFERENT
WAYS OF TUNING THE UD
The
ud can be tuned in 4 different ways as shown below. The notes are
given in the order of higher to lower pitches.
The
ancient plectrum of the ud which used to be made from the wing of a
young male eager has now left its place to both flexible and strong
plectrums made from plastic of good quality with a length of 11-13
cm, a width of 6 mm and a thickness of 0.6-0.8 mm. These plectrums
have their tips rounded parabolically and are polished with felt (The
plectrums made of thin plastic bag handles or such are not suitable
for good quality-instruments and players.) Moreover, the plectrums
made of the plastic material “I-20” and of average-flexibility
are widely preferred nowadays.
The
toughness and the flexibility of the plectrum may change according
to the preferences of the player. There is no standard or
stipulations on this issue, because some important players have
preferred tough plectrums whereas others have preferred a soft and
flexible type. For instance, Targan used a flexible plectrum of
average-toughness and with a thin tip. Yorgo Bacanos, on the other
hand, preferred a quite tough plectrum. Furthermore, the way that
the plectrum is held and the angle are as important as the toughness
issues, as they influence the timbre and the volume of the sound
obtained from the ud. This is a critical issue for the beginners, as
it would be quite tough to switch from the wrong way to the right
one at later stages.
THE
PLACE AND THE IMPORTANCE OF UD IN TURKISH MUSIC
Due
to the superiority of the ney-tanbur duo in the Ottoman palace, the ud
has lost its popularity in-between 16th and 19th
centuries. On the contrary, it has been widely accepted in the Arap
community, whom they named the instrument as “queen of the instruments”.
The ud player, M. Abdulvehhâb, who tells that he learned music by
listening to the records of Tanburî Cemil, and the others Muhammed el-Kassapçı,
Riyâz el-Simbâtî, Ferîd el-Atrâş, Cemil and Munir Beşir brothers
who helped training Turkish ud virtuoso Ş. M. Targan and Selman Şukur
are the prominent ud players of the Arab society. As for the Turkish
music history, ud has been an auxiliary instrument to the great
musicologists such as Farâbî, Safiyüddîn and Merâgî, on their
theoretical works.
FORMER
UD PLAYERS
Ud
player and violoncellist Şakir Paşa is the one who has made the ud
gain its respect in the Turkish society and the one who added the 6th
string to this instrument. Nevres Bey has followed him and later on came
other ud players from various schools such as Ali Rif’at, Musa Süreyya,
İbrahim Ziya (Özbekkan) Beyler, Şerif Muhiddin Targan, Selânikli
Ahmed, Serop and Küçük Sarkis Efendiler, Şerif İçli, Yorgo Bacanos,
Şekip Memduh, Hrant Emre and Kadri Şençalar. They are the ones who
made the Turkish community accept and admire the ud. It is possible to
investigate these musicians in three categories: Classical, progressive
and popular. The classical group would include from Nevres Bey to Şerif
İçli, progressives would be from Targan to Bacanos, whereas the
popular group would compose of musicians beginning from Selânikli Ahmed
to Kadri Şençalar. Excluding the classical group, the others still
exist today even though their pioneers have passed away. The young
musicians of the conservatories continue the progressive group. However,
the last representative of the classical group, Câhid Gözkân, has
passed away at the age of 93.
Among
one of the schools of ud is that of Cinuçen Tanrıkorur, who has
recently passed away (June 28, 2001). The way he plays the ud is plain
and without agitation, which resembles the timber of tanbur. In his own
words, it is “based on the manner in which tanbur is played”. His
playing features can also bee seen in his genius instrumental and vocal
works. He had many pupils and many of them continue his tradition today.
His first student was Saim Konakçı, which passed away in 1996.
TURKISH
UD PLAYERS OF TODAY
There
are few players today, who have the ability to use the characteristics of
all schools mentioned above. The most prominent one of them is Necati Çelik,
who is not devoted entirely to one school but who can put into practice
any kind of agitation and use all the features of classical, progressive
and/or popularist schools skillfully. With his abilities of such, he is
well known in many countries, especially in USA, where he has many
students.
Other
master players of today would include Mutlu Torun, Samim Karaca, O. Nuri
Özpekel, Coşkun Sabah, Yılmaz Yüksel, Teoman Önaldı, Bayram Coşkuner,
Sedat Oytun and Yurdal Tokcan.
FORMER
AND CONTEMPORARY MAKERS OF THE UD
Like
all the other Turk instruments, ud is hand-made, being difficult and
requiring a long time to learn. All the masters have their own way of
manufacturing, which is passed on from master to pupil or from father to
son. For this reason, uds are usually referred to by mentioning the makers’
names. There are many luthiers around the world, especially in the Arabic
states and USA. But it is without argument that, regarding their
historical facts Turkish uds are masterpieces. The uds of Master Manol
(1845-1915) and Master Ilya (1870-1930) are still of great value today.
Some of the masters of today, which can produce uds of good quality
include Ejder Güleç, Mustafa Arslan Biçicioğlu, Şinasi Özkan, Vasfi
Çınlar, Nuri Tutpınar, Hadi Usta, Halim Özer, Sami Gül, Fevzi Daloğlu,
Sabri Göktepe and Sadettin Sandı.
Ud
needs to be well protected while not played. Hands must be clean, for it
facilitates the movement of the fingers and prevents the dirt to damage the
strings. The soundboard should not be touched with dirty hands as well. The
place where the arm contacts the ud while playing should be covered with a
cloth, or a cuff should be worn to keep it clean. Any kind of chemical such as
soap, alcohol, furniture, automobile and metal polish should never be used to
either rub or clean the soundboard and the body. A dry cloth should be used
for possible dust and/or stains on the body. Stains on the board should be
sanded or cleaned with such materials. For the cases where the pegs get stuck,
it is not correct to apply materials such as lead, powder, soap, pastel
crayons and/or lubricants. In such situations, the best thing to do would be
to take it back to the manufacturer.
Ud
should be kept in a wardrobe not closed to daylight, and should be put in a
position such that the soundboard is on the shelf. It is not recommended to
hang the ud up on the wall. Attention should be payed that the ud is not under
direct sunlight. Ud should also be protected from moisture and kept in a dry
place where humidity is at a high level.
The
strings should be loosened a bit when the ud is not played. It is recommended
that ud is carried in cases made from fiberglas, but not kept in them for a
long time. It should be kept away from closed and hot environments, especially
in summer.
Like
other Turkish instruments, there is no standard way of manufacturing the ud.
This variation is seen both for the size and the sound quality. For those who
are going to buy an ud, it is recommended that they take an advice from
someone experienced in the field. There are many types of uds in the market,
ranging from very cheap ones to very expensive ones. Although economically
attractive, cheap uds are not recommended since they are made of material of
poor quality, with bad timbres. Starting to learn with such an instrument of
bad quality would be wrong and may result in not learning and even loosing the
interest in the instrument.
Ud
has a wide sound range since it has a fretless fingerboard. Compared to other
instruments of the same type, it is both technical and difficult to play. It
should be learned under direct supervision of a master. There are several
methods on the playing technique, and some of them would include those of
Kadri Şençalar, Mutlu Torun, Onur Akdoğu, Şerif Muhiddin Targan and Cinuçen
Tanrıkorur. |
||||
|
Prepared by Ali Tutan alitutan@turkmusikisi.net |
||||
|
(Translated
from Turkish by Tolga Bektaş) tbektas@baskent.edu.tr
|
[1] See Köprülü, Fuad, Türk Edebiyatında İlk Mutasavvıflar (First Sufis in Turkish Literature), Ankara University Press, Ankara 1966, pp. 207, 209.; Gazimihal, Mahmud Ragıb, Ülkelerde Kopuz ve Tezeneli Sazlarımız, Ankara University Press, Ankara 1975, p. 64. and Musiki Sözlüğü (Dictionary of Music), M.E.B. İstanbul 1961, pp. 138, 259, 260.; Sachs, Curt, The History of Musical Instruments, New York 1940, p. 252.
[2] See Gazimihal, Mahmud Ragıb, Ülkelerde Kopuz …, p. 51.
[3] Uzunçarşılı, İ. Hakkı, Osmanlılar Zamanında Musiki Hayatı (Musical Life in the Palaces During the Time of the Ottomans), Belleten XLI (161), pp. 79-114, 1977.